
By Deborah Devenney and Naomi Peirce
The 1976 film All the President’s Men shows the exhaustive work of Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward (Robert Redford) and Carl Bernstein (Dustin Hoffman) as they uncover the criminal Watergate scandal. Woodward was assigned to write a story covering the break-in at the Watergate building, yet the more questions he asked, the fewer answers he received, and the story got increasingly complex and shady. The Post was very concerned, having an inexperienced reporter working on such a dangerous story, so they also assigned the more experienced Bernstein to work on it. The two spend weeks knocking on doors and taking comprehensive notes on dozens of interviews, though no one is willing to go on the record in connection with the conspiracy. In the end, their “long shot” theories are found to be true, and several politicians are arrested in connection with the Watergate Scandal, and President Nixon himself resigns.
The film won four Oscars, including best screenplay based on material from another medium, and was nominated for four others. The writing is superb, and Hoffman and Redford’s characters are natural, vulnerable, and brilliant. The film opens with some real footage of Nixon and then with a reenactment of the break-in at Watergate. It then follows chronologically the entire investigative journalism process, in all its pain and glory.
It is a fascinating story and an engaging plot. It is a treat to watch the struggles these reporters went through, and how much of themselves they poured into breaking the story. It is physically, mentally, and morally challenging. They got phone calls in the middle of the night, worked until the crack of dawn to get the facts they needed. They pieced together a crime from a thousand tiny parts, and none of them were ever complete. They broke rules, wrote new ones, and did anything they could to deliver the truth to the American people.
This movie demonstrates the purpose of having a free press. What Woodward and Bernstein did was honor the heart of journalism in a democratic society: monitor power. They refused to dismiss their intuition that the break-in was only a smaller piece of a much larger story, even when they got limited answers to their questions. The pair also displayed the disciple of verification, checking and double checking their facts before they printed anything. In the beginning, Bernstein wanted to go on instincts alone, since no one would confirm his beliefs, but Woodward insisted on verifying each fact so the story was credible and reflective of the truth. In the spirit of continuing their journalistic integrity, as a tribute to their hard work, this film is a wonderful salute to two great American journalists.
